WeGrowFaith

Mysticism

The Indwelling Presence: A.E. Waite, the Zohar, and the Recovery of the Divine Feminine in Western Mysticism

August 20, 2026

One familiar image of God in Western religion is the sovereign king: powerful, distant, issuing commands from above. The image can express transcendence and moral authority. When it becomes the only image available, however, faith can begin to feel like life under surveillance. God is near enough to judge but too remote to accompany.

Jewish mystical tradition developed a different set of images around the Shekinah, the divine presence that dwells with creation. In the Zohar, the central work of medieval Kabbalah, the Shekinah is described through feminine symbols including Mother, Daughter, Queen, and Bride. She enters exile with Israel and participates in the drama of estrangement and restoration.

British mystic and scholar Arthur Edward Waite brought this theology to English-speaking esoteric readers in his 1913 study The Secret Doctrine in Israel. Waite’s interpretation has limits. He relied heavily on Jean de Pauly’s French translation rather than the Zohar’s Aramaic text. Yet Gershom Scholem, a foundational modern scholar of Jewish mysticism, later credited him with recognizing the Shekinah’s central place in the Zoharic world.

Waite gives contemporary seekers a useful doorway into the tradition, provided we remember whose tradition it is and distinguish the Zohar’s theology from the modern applications we build from it.

Waite’s Contemplative Reading of the Zohar

Waite is now widely associated with the Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot deck, which he created with artist Pamela Colman Smith. His own interests were broader. He wrote about what he called the “Secret Tradition,” a current of Kabbalistic, Hermetic, and Christian mystical thought concerned with direct communion with God.

In The Secret Doctrine in Israel, Waite approached the Zohar as contemplative theology rather than a codebook for ceremonial magic. He argued that the doctrine of the Shekinah supplied the work’s organizing center:

“The doctrine concerning Shekinah is the root and center of the Secret Doctrine in Israel… It is the Mystery of Faith, the key of all knowledge, and the threshold through which the soul enters into the divine life.”

This was Waite’s reading of a complex, layered Jewish text, not an uncontested summary of all Kabbalah. It was nevertheless perceptive enough to attract Scholem’s qualified praise. Scholem valued Waite’s grasp of the Zohar’s theological world while criticizing the linguistic limits imposed by translation.

The distinction matters. Waite can help us see the architecture of an idea without becoming our sole authority on the tradition that produced it.

Shekinah Above and Shekinah Below

The Hebrew root behind Shekinah concerns dwelling. In Jewish tradition, the term came to name God’s manifest or indwelling presence. The Zohar develops that presence within its symbolic account of the divine life and the ten sephirot, the emanations or attributes through which the hidden divine reality relates to creation.

Waite described a distinction between Shekinah above and Shekinah below.

The Shekinah above is associated with Binah, Understanding, and appears as the Supernal Mother. The Shekinah below is associated with Malkhut, Kingdom, and appears as the Daughter, Bride, Queen, or Matrona. One image looks toward the divine source; the other names the presence dwelling within the created order.

Waite summarized the lower aspect as “the indwelling glory, the divine presence manifested in the world of action.” Elsewhere he called her “the Mother of all living, the Bride of the Word, and the channel through which grace descends into the soul.”

These symbols do not simply divide God into a male deity and a female deity. Zoharic theology remains concerned with the unity of divine reality. Masculine and feminine imagery expresses relationships within that unity, including giving and receiving, transcendence and manifestation, separation and reunion.

For contemporary readers, that symbolic range can correct a narrowed imagination. The point is not that masculine language for God must disappear. It is that no human image exhausts divine reality.

The Presence in Exile

The Zohar’s account of exile gives the Shekinah particular emotional and theological force. When Israel goes into exile, the divine presence goes too.

Waite quotes the tradition this way:

“When Israel is in exile the Shekinah is also in exile. It is for this reason that the Holy One will remember Israel in the day of redemption, because His own Presence is bound up in their suffering.”

This is first a claim within Jewish mystical reflection on Israel, the Temple, exile, and redemption. It should not be detached from that history and converted into a generic symbol without remainder.

It can also support a wider theological reflection. Divine transcendence does not have to mean divine detachment. In the Zoharic narrative, estrangement affects the manifested life of God. The Shekinah is not merely observing exile; she is present within it.

That changes the spiritual question. Instead of asking only how we escape the place of suffering to find God, we can ask how divine presence may already be encountered there. This does not explain why suffering occurs, and it does not make suffering holy. It offers companionship rather than an abstract solution.

Kabbalistic restoration, often discussed through the language of tikkun, concerns the repair of this estrangement and the reunion of the Shekinah with the Holy One. Human prayer, justice, and faithful action participate in that drama. The symbolism gives ordinary conduct cosmic weight without pretending that human beings control the whole process.

Embodied Relationship and Sacred Union

Waite devoted a chapter of The Secret Doctrine in Israel to what he called “The Mystery of Sex.” There he presented the Zohar’s treatment of marital union as an earthly reflection of union within the divine life.

He wrote:

“In the Mystery of Sex, so far as the statements in the text are concerned, there is nothing less consecrated than the highest sacramental rites… It is the earthly counterpart of that supernal union which maintains the life of the universe.”

This vision contrasts with Christian ascetic traditions that treated celibacy as a higher state and sometimes regarded sexuality with suspicion. The comparison should not be flattened into “Judaism celebrates the body while Christianity rejects it.” Both traditions contain multiple voices. Waite’s point is narrower and more useful: in the Zoharic material he examined, embodied marital love could participate in sacred order rather than stand outside it.

That framework also requires care in modern application. A mystical account of union should never be used to impose a relationship, sanctify coercion, or treat one model of human life as spiritually mandatory. Its value lies in refusing the assumption that embodiment is automatically an obstacle to holiness.

Recovering the Indwelling Presence

Waite’s reading offers three shifts for people reconstructing faith.

First, transcendence can be held together with immanence. God may exceed creation without being absent from it. The language of Shekinah gives presence its own theological weight.

Second, suffering need not be interpreted as proof of abandonment. The Shekinah in exile does not remove grief or solve its causes. She represents divine solidarity within estrangement.

Third, embodied life can become a site of spiritual meaning. Relationship, physical existence, justice, prayer, and ordinary acts of care need not compete with contemplation.

These are contemporary applications drawn from Waite’s interpretation of Jewish mystical sources. They are not claims that the Zohar was written to answer modern Christian deconstruction. The difference is part of honest borrowing.

The Shekinah widens the spiritual imagination because she names a presence that dwells, accompanies, and participates in restoration. For people who have known God mainly as a distant ruler, that is not a replacement deity. It is a neglected way of speaking about nearness.

Sources and Further Reading